Sunday, 18 May 2025

We need to talk about Graham

 









Graham Norton needs to go from our Eurovision presentation. He sounded bored, jaded and like he’d rather have been somewhere else last night and he is also rather rude. He needs to remember that it’s a show with 200 million viewers around the globe so has to appeal to a very broad demographic. Slagging off the comic skits isn't a good look, especially when they're being delivered by women trying to make the best of appealing to the sense of humour of a multitude of nationalities and cultures. Maybe there aren't enough A-list Hollywood actors on the show for him to giggle along with. Oh, that's right, there aren't ANY A-list Hollywood actors at this show. That's one of his problems; he never comes across as a Man Of the People. 

Also, his undisguised disdain for any kind of rock music is pretty condescending. Guess what, Graham, rock music is still pretty popular in Europe. And does he actually LIKE music? I realise that a liking of music isn't exactly a prerequisite of having absolutely anything to do with the Eurovision Song Contest but surely it helps?

I will give him his due, though, he was measured and balanced when introducing the Israeli entry. He didn't shy away from mentioning that their continued presence in the competition is a cause of much debate but also spoke about the human element of the whole thing (even though he didn't say anything about the Israeli entrant, Yuval Raphael, being part of the October 7th attacks, sustaining shrapnel injuries and having to play dead for eight hours).


Can we also lay the ghost of Terry Wogan to rest? The last time he commentated was in 2008 and he’s been dead for nearly a decade. A large number of under 25s watch Eurovision and won’t have a clue who he is.

The UK commentary needs to be a lot more positive and to actually get into the whole spirit of the thing.

The UK presentation of the event needs a big reset. A new commentator please. Preferably one who actually likes Eurovision. And British. A woman maybe? Hannah Waddingham? Sara Cox? Mel Giedroyc?


Saturday, 5 April 2025

How many hours…?

This is a really interesting piece that I've linked to at the bottom of this post. I sometimes find it exhausting, all this talk of seasons and hours and hours of the same telly programme. I find it all overwhelming sometimes and wonder where people find the time to sit and get invested in these things. There's currently a few things on the streaming sites that I'm interested in but I just think "Where am I going to find the time to watch ALL of that?"

I say this as someone who has, this past week, watched and enjoyed something I haven't seen for over thirty years. Take Me Home was a three part series produced by the BBC in 1989 and shown over three consecutive weeks. Nobody demanded to see the next one straight away. You had to wait. For seven days. 

And the story, of a love affair between two married people of a large age difference, was begun and ended within three hours of television. It didn't need to be stretched out to ten hours or go to six series. It started and ended in three hours. 

I heard this week that the BBC are considering bringing back Play For Today,/The Wednesday Play. How wonderful would that be? A story told within 70/80/90 minutes. When one looks at old Play For Today/The Wednesday Play did anyone demand another seven hours of Cathy Come Home, Up the Junction, Abigail's Party, Blue Remembered Hills, Penda's Fen, Kisses At Fifty, East of Ipswich, Sunset Across the Bay, The Firm or Nuts in May? No, they didn't. Tell your story succinctly but with impact.


Sidebar: despite the pic on this Substack post, I LOVED Mad Men and didn’t want it to end. I could also never understand why Joan or Peggy didn’t get their own spinoff show set in the 1970s.

https://open.substack.com/pub/joelmorris/p/homeopathic-storytelling?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web